Atom x7-Z8700 vs Celeron N4100

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.55
+86.7%

Celeron N4100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21172576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency24.45no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier1116
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHz600 MHz
Execution Units1216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes62
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports83
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4100 1.55
+86.7%
Atom x7-Z8700 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4100 2457
+85.6%
Atom x7-Z8700 1324

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N4100 309
+72.6%
Atom x7-Z8700 179

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N4100 825
+59.9%
Atom x7-Z8700 516

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N4100 2013
+80.7%
Atom x7-Z8700 1114

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N4100 5904
+89.5%
Atom x7-Z8700 3116

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N4100 19.41
+26.3%
Atom x7-Z8700 24.51

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N4100 2
+73%
Atom x7-Z8700 1

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N4100 198
+70.7%
Atom x7-Z8700 116

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4100 69
+82.9%
Atom x7-Z8700 38

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4100 0.83
+102%
Atom x7-Z8700 0.41

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Celeron N4100 12
+14.8%
Atom x7-Z8700 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Celeron N4100 58
+14.5%
Atom x7-Z8700 51

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Celeron N4100 5042
+52.8%
Atom x7-Z8700 3300

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Celeron N4100 1629
+67.9%
Atom x7-Z8700 970

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 0.83
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 11 December 2017 2 March 2015

Celeron N4100 has a 86.7% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Celeron N4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and Atom x7-Z8700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Atom x7-Z8700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 431 vote

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 vote

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4100 or Atom x7-Z8700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.