Xeon D-2896TER vs Celeron N3350

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2705not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency10.99no data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)no data
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads240
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB1 TB
Max memory channels24
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes632
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports224
Number of USB ports84
Integrated LAN-+
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 40
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 110 Watt

Celeron N3350 has 1733.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2896TER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896TER is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Xeon D-2896TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Xeon D-2896TER
Xeon D-2896TER

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 953 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2896TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Xeon D-2896TER, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.