Celeron U3400 vs 1007U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2846not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.95no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeDMIDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier158
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 839
+62.6%
Celeron U3400 516

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1007U 252
+43.2%
Celeron U3400 176

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1007U 421
+34.5%
Celeron U3400 313

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 24 May 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron 1007U has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 124 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.