Atom C3808 vs Celeron N3350

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2701not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency10.94no data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24$369

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier1122
L1 cacheno data672 KB
L2 cache1 MB12 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C86 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports216
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports216
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN-4x10/2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N3350 has 316.7% lower power consumption.

Atom C3808, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 953 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.