Atom C3758 vs Celeron N3350
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3758 outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2696 | 1649 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.69 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 10.94 | 10.98 |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 30 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $24 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 11 | 22 |
| L1 cache | no data | 448 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 82 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | - | no data |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4: 2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 500 | no data |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | no data |
| OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 16 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | - | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 3.01 |
| Recency | 30 August 2016 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron N3350 has 316.7% lower power consumption.
Atom C3758, on the other hand, has a 318.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
