Xeon W-1350 vs Celeron N2815

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2815
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.31
Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
11.97
+3761%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N2815 by a whopping 3761% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3106649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.51
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.9114.16
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data276 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1066DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2815 0.31
Xeon W-1350 11.97
+3761%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2815 492
Xeon W-1350 19007
+3763%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2815 151
Xeon W-1350 2153
+1326%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2815 251
Xeon W-1350 8167
+3154%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 11.97
Integrated graphics card 0.77 4.56
Recency 1 December 2013 6 May 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron N2815 has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-1350, on the other hand, has a 3761.3% higher aggregate performance score, 492.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2815 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2815 and Xeon W-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2815
Celeron N2815
Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 40 votes

Rate Celeron N2815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2815 or Xeon W-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.