Solo T1400 vs Celeron N2810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCore Solo
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170PPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Connect+no data
FSB parityno data-
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2810 377
+49%
Solo T1400 253

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2810 63.4
+49.8%
Solo T1400 95

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron N2810 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Core Solo T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810
Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2810 or Core Solo T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.