Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Celeron M ULV 722

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiencyno data36.80
Architecture codenameno dataCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.6 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.775V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP6
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M ULV 722 has 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M ULV 722
Celeron M ULV 722
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M ULV 722 or Ryzen 9 5900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.