Ryzen 7 3780U vs Celeron M U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data27.63
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
Multiplierno data23
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size81+114 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1288FP5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 3780U has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U
Ryzen 7 3780U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3780U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Ryzen 7 3780U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.