Ryzen 7 3780U vs Celeron M U3400

Place in the ranking	3121	1353
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency	1.52	27.63
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	no data	2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	4 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	no data
Multiplier	no data	23
L1 cache	no data	96K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	210 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	4,940 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	BGA1288	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	no data	32 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	4.38
Recency	24 May 2010	6 January 2019
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	15 Watt

Ryzen 7 3780U has a 1410.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 3780U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 3780U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.