Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Celeron M P4500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.68no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4500 2533
+49.4%
Athlon X2 QL-66 1695

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4500 4826
+45.4%
Athlon X2 QL-66 3320

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

Celeron M P4500 has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Athlon X2 QL-66, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
Athlon X2 QL-66

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-66 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or Athlon X2 QL-66, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.