Pentium M 770 vs Athlon X2 QL-66

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-66
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
+111%
Pentium M 770
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.19

Athlon X2 QL-66 outperforms Pentium M 770 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30033244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonPentium M
Power efficiency1.080.67
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)19 January 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.01 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache256 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.372V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g2PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-66 0.40
+111%
Pentium M 770 0.19

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-66 1520
+105%
Pentium M 770 740

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.19
Recency 1 September 2009 19 January 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-66 has a 110.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 770, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X2 QL-66 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium M 770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
Athlon X2 QL-66
Intel Pentium M 770
Pentium M 770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-66 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Pentium M 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-66 or Pentium M 770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.