Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs Celeron M 900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE outperforms Celeron M 900 by a whopping 8513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3385 | 1012 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.22 | 18.63 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.08 | 6.89 |
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE has a 8512.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 900 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
