i7-11700K vs Celeron M 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i5-11400 Core i5-11400F Core i5-11600K Core i5-11600KF Core i7-11700 Core i7-11700F Core i7-11700K Core i7-11700KF Core i9-11900 Core i9-11900F Core i9-11900K Core i9-11900KF

Contents

Celeron M 900 Celeron M 900
i7-11700K i7-11700K

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Core i7
Power efficiencyno data11.72
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 900 123
i7-11700K 24574
+19879%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 900 2101
i7-11700K 9621
+358%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 900 1000
i7-11700K 16388
+1539%

Pros & cons summary

Recency 1 April 2009 16 March 2021
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron M 900 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i7-11700K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 900 is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700K is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Core i7-11700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
Intel Core i7-11700K
Core i7-11700K
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron M 900 Celeron M 900
vs
i7-2649M Core i7 2649M
i7-11700K Core i7 11700K
vs
i5-14400T Core i5 14400T
Celeron M 900 Celeron M 900
vs
Turion X2 RM-77 Turion X2 RM-77
Atom D2550 Atom D2550
vs
Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
Core 2 Quad Q9550 Core 2 Quad Q9550
vs
Pentium Dual T3200 Pentium Dual Core T3200
Core 2 Quad Q9100 Core 2 Quad Q9100
vs
Ryzen 5 6600HS Ryzen 5 6600HS
Phenom II X6 1065T Phenom II X6 1065T
vs
A4-5300 A4 5300
i5-7600 Core i5 7600
vs
A10-4655M A10 4655M
Pentium Dual T2370 Pentium Dual Core T2370
vs
Celeron 900 Celeron 900
Core 2 Duo E4500 Core 2 Duo E4500
vs
Pentium B915C Pentium B915C
Ryzen 5 1600X Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Pentium Gold 8505 Pentium Gold 8505
Core 2 Duo E8400 Core 2 Duo E8400
vs
i5-8210Y Core i5 8210Y
Phenom II X4 925 Phenom II X4 925
vs
Pentium E5800 Pentium E5800

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1615 votes

Rate Core i7-11700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Core i7-11700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.