Celeron J1800 vs M 900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date	1 April 2009 (15 years ago)	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$70	$72

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.58 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	112 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	no data	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	45 nm	22 nm
Die size	107 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	410 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PGA478	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
PAE	no data	36 Bit
FDI	no data	-
RST	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	no data	+
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	8 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version	no data	2.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 April 2009	1 November 2013
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	45 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---