Athlon II X2 265 vs Celeron M 900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	2600
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	1.64
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron M	no data
Power efficiency	no data	1.16
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Regor (2009−2013)
Release date	1 April 2009 (15 years ago)	21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$70	$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	no data	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	45 nm
Die size	107 mm2	117 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	410 Million	410 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PGA478	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 April 2009	21 September 2010
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Athlon II X2 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---