Ryzen 9 5950X vs Celeron M 743
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 159 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 26.59 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.88 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 5 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $799 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | CPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA965 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 5 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 950% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 5950X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 743 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
