Celeron M 743 vs M 320

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron M 743 has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.