Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 8833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3320 | 562 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | 84.54 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA965 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 13.40 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 50% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, on the other hand, has a 8833.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
