GX-210JA vs Celeron M 743

Place in the ranking	3322	3307
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD
Power efficiency	1.43	2.38
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Temash (2013)
Release date	1 September 2009 (15 years ago)	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Boost clock speed	1.3 GHz	1 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Die size	107 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	410 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA965	FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Recency	1 September 2009	23 May 2013
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

GX-210JA has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.