Xeon Gold 6161 vs Celeron M 723
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2008 (16 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 44 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.375 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 22 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 30.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA956 | Socket P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 22 |
| Threads | 1 | 44 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron M 723 has 3200% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6161, on the other hand, has 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 723 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6161 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 723 and Xeon Gold 6161, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
