Atom D2500 vs Celeron M 723

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 723
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17
+13.3%
Atom D2500
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.15

Celeron M 723 outperforms Atom D2500 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32673301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.221.42
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500.

PCI Express lanesno data4
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 723 0.17
+13.3%
Atom D2500 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 723 267
+10.8%
Atom D2500 241

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.15
Recency 1 September 2008 1 November 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron M 723 has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% lower power consumption.

Atom D2500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron M 723 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 723 and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 723
Celeron M 723
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Celeron M 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 723 or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.