Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Celeron M 722
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 722 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 562 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 84.34 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 722 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 722 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | VGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron M 722 has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
