Duron 1300 vs Celeron M 722
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Duron |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 January 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 105.68 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 25 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | VGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 60 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 30 January 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 60 Watt |
Celeron M 722 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 722 is a notebook processor while Duron 1300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and Duron 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
