Xeon D-2899NT vs Celeron M 383

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,138

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm10 nm
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 22
Threads 1 44
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 135 Watt

Celeron M 383 has 2600% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2899NT, on the other hand, has 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 383 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2899NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 383 and Xeon D-2899NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 383
Celeron M 383
Intel Xeon D-2899NT
Xeon D-2899NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 383 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-2899NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 383 or Xeon D-2899NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.