Celeron M 383 vs Core 2 Duo SL9300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCeleron M
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz400 MHz
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 5 Watt

Core 2 Duo SL9300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 383, on the other hand, has 240% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9300 and Celeron M 383, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
Core 2 Duo SL9300
Intel Celeron M 383
Celeron M 383

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 383 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SL9300 or Celeron M 383, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.