Solo ULV U1500 vs Celeron M 383

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data479
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt5 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

Solo ULV U1500 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 383 and Core Solo ULV U1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 383
Celeron M 383
Intel Core Solo ULV U1500
Core Solo ULV U1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 383 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Solo ULV U1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 383 or Core Solo ULV U1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.