EPYC 7H12 vs Celeron M 370

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated47
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron MAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.