Pentium III 1400S vs Celeron M 360

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Celeron M	no data
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release date	no data	January 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.4 GHz	1.4 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	8 KB
L2 cache	no data	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	130 nm
Die size	no data	80 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	69 °C
Number of transistors	no data	44 million
64 bit support	-	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478, H-PBGA479	370
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	90 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	32 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 360 and Pentium III 1400S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---