VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 vs Celeron M 333

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 333 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MC7-M
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Esther
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 333 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 333 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt3.5 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 3 Watt

VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 333 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 333 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 333
Celeron M 333
VIA C7-M C7-M-1000
C7-M C7-M-1000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 333 or VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.