Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Celeron M 310
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 52.59 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron M 310 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
