Ultra 5 135H vs Celeron J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.90
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.98
+688%

Core Ultra 5 135H outperforms Celeron J4105 by a whopping 688% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1987489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency17.3348.78
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$342

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads418
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® Arc™ graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz2.2 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes68
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.90
Ultra 5 135H 14.98
+688%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2908
Ultra 5 135H 22927
+688%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 14.98
Recency 11 December 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 4 18
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 180% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 135H, on the other hand, has a 688.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 250% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

The Core Ultra 5 135H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 135H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 5 135H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 135H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core Ultra 5 135H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.