Ryzen Embedded V1780B vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2526 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.67 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
Power efficiency | 8.80 | no data |
Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 33.5 |
L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has 350% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded V1780B, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded V1780B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen Embedded V1780B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.