Ultra 5 125U vs Celeron J4025

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
Core Ultra 5 125U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
10.99
+1082%

Core Ultra 5 125U outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 1082% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2511705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.57no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency8.8069.34
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$363

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.85 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes612
PCI supportno data4.0
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
Ultra 5 125U 10.99
+1082%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1473
Ultra 5 125U 17451
+1085%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4025 148
Ultra 5 125U 1657
+1020%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4025 77
Ultra 5 125U 225
+192%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4025 927
Ultra 5 125U 8311
+797%

Blender(-)

Celeron J4025 3792
+983%
Ultra 5 125U 350

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron J4025 500
Ultra 5 125U 1569
+214%

7-Zip Single

Celeron J4025 2636
Ultra 5 125U 4598
+74.4%

7-Zip

Celeron J4025 4955
Ultra 5 125U 39087
+689%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron J4025 89
Ultra 5 125U 245
+174%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 10.99
Recency 4 November 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 14
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 125U, on the other hand, has a 1081.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

The Core Ultra 5 125U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 125U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Core Ultra 5 125U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
Core Ultra 5 125U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 86 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Core Ultra 5 125U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.