Athlon II X2 220 vs Celeron J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
+40.9%
Athlon II X2 220
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66

Celeron J4025 outperforms Athlon II X2 220 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25262759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.675.30
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.800.96
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 220 has 99% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size93 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090AM3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
+40.9%
Athlon II X2 220 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
+41.6%
Athlon II X2 220 1043

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 329
+14.2%
Athlon II X2 220 288

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 539
+8.9%
Athlon II X2 220 495

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.66
Recency 4 November 2019 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron J4025 has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4025 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Athlon II X2 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 234 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Athlon II X2 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.