Processor N200 vs Celeron J3455E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455E
2019
4 threads, 10 Watt
1.43
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.62
+13.3%

Processor N200 outperforms Celeron J3455E by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22152104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency13.0424.62
Architecture codenameno dataAlder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes69

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 1.62
Integrated graphics card 0.77 3.29
Recency 1 July 2019 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, 327.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455E in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455E is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455E and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 141 vote

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455E or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.