Celeron 3215U vs J4025

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
+36.8%
Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68

Celeron J4025 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25112722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.60no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency8.804.29
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache56 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response--
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency700 MHz850 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes612
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
+36.8%
Celeron 3215U 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1473
+36%
Celeron 3215U 1083

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 330
Celeron 3215U 332
+0.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 542
Celeron 3215U 588
+8.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.68
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 4 November 2019 1 June 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4025 has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4025 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3215U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.