Xeon E7-8880 v3 vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72
Xeon E7-8880 v3
2015
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
11.49
+1496%

Xeon E7-8880 v3 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 1496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2676677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.817.77
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Haswell-EX (2015)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads436
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C77 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bit46 Bit
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes432

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
Xeon E7-8880 v3 11.49
+1496%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151
Xeon E7-8880 v3 18244
+1485%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 11.49
Recency 1 November 2013 1 June 2015
Physical cores 4 18
Threads 4 36
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8880 v3, on the other hand, has a 1495.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

The Xeon E7-8880 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-8880 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Xeon E7-8880 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3
Xeon E7-8880 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8880 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Xeon E7-8880 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.