Sempron 2650 vs Celeron J1900

Place in the ranking	2698	3067
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	6.81	1.32
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	1.45 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1024 KB
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Die size	no data	107 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	90 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM1
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	FMA4
AVX	-	+
PowerNow	-	+
PowerGating	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
IOMMU 2.0	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์	no data	128
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Enduro	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	no data
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	4	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
+106%

Sempron 2650 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1149
+109%

Sempron 2650 551

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173
+19.3%

Sempron 2650 145

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 517
+121%

Sempron 2650 234

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.72	0.35
Recency	1 November 2013	9 April 2014
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	25 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 105.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Sempron 2650, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Celeron J1900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 2650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2650 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Sempron 2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.