Ryzen 5 2600H vs Celeron J1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Ryzen 5 2600H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.04
+1300%

Ryzen 5 2600H outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 1300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30351215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency3.4131.80
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)30 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache112 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36
Ryzen 5 2600H 5.04
+1300%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573
Ryzen 5 2600H 8002
+1297%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 5.04
Integrated graphics card 0.77 4.50
Recency 1 November 2013 30 May 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 2600H, on the other hand, has a 1300% higher aggregate performance score, 484.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 2600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 2600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Ryzen 5 2600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 534 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Ryzen 5 2600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.