Ryzen 5 5500U vs Celeron J1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Ryzen 5 5500U
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
8.19
+2175%

Ryzen 5 5500U outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 2175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3035919
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency3.4131.00
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36
Ryzen 5 5500U 8.19
+2175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573
Ryzen 5 5500U 13017
+2172%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 8.19
Integrated graphics card 0.77 7.46
Recency 1 November 2013 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5500U, on the other hand, has a 2175% higher aggregate performance score, 868.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 5500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 5 5500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Ryzen 5 5500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 534 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 18594 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Ryzen 5 5500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.