EPYC 7763 vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated25
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.13
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data18.00
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$7,890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cache112 KB4 MB
L2 cache1 MB32 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
EPYC 7763 84557
+14111%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 2700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.