Celeron G465 vs G1830

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2467not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.72no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache2 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1830 1560
+185%
Celeron G465 547

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 1 September 2012
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G1830 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G465, on the other hand, has 51.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1830 and Celeron G465, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1830
Celeron G1830
Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1830 or Celeron G465, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.