Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron G1820TE

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820TE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
0.67
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.75
+6430%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Celeron G1820TE by a whopping 6430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking274954
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.51
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.1331.91
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die size177 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket11501851
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD (Haswell)Arc Xe-2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1820TE 0.67
Ultra 9 285K 43.75
+6430%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1820TE 1020
Ultra 9 285K 66951
+6464%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 43.75
Recency 1 December 2013 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron G1820TE has 131.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 6429.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820TE and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820TE
Celeron G1820TE
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron G1820TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820TE or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.