Athlon II X2 220 vs Celeron G1820TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820TE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
0.64
Athlon II X2 220
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66
+3.1%

Athlon II X2 220 outperforms Celeron G1820TE by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27702759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.30
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.120.96
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size177 mm2117 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1150AM3
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD (Haswell)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1820TE 0.64
Athlon II X2 220 0.66
+3.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1820TE 1020
Athlon II X2 220 1043
+2.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.66
Recency 1 December 2013 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G1820TE has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X2 220, on the other hand, has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820TE and Athlon II X2 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820TE
Celeron G1820TE
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron G1820TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 234 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820TE or Athlon II X2 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.