Atom N455 vs Celeron G1820TE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2752 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.12 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $64 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 123 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Haswell) | Intel GMA 3150 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2013 | 1 June 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron G1820TE has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N455, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G1820TE is a desktop processor while Atom N455 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820TE and Atom N455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
