Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron G1820

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.08
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
52.69
+4779%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G1820 by a whopping 4779% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking240527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.076.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency1.8917.81
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 8529% better value for money than Celeron G1820.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache2 MB256 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size177 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million38740 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors-
Max video memory1.7 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hz-
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe versionUp to 3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1820 1.08
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52.69
+4779%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1820 1718
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83697
+4772%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1820 488
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1588
+225%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1820 830
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14036
+1591%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 52.69
Recency 1 December 2013 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron G1820 has 428.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 4778.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1820 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 825 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.