Atom 330 vs Celeron E1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46
+100%
Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23

Celeron E1400 outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1400 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29353189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.672.72
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$43

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1400 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C85 °C
Number of transistors105 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1400 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron E1400 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1400 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1400 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1400 0.46
+100%
Atom 330 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1400 735
+102%
Atom 330 363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.23
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 8 Watt

Celeron E1400 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 712.5% lower power consumption.

The Celeron E1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1400 is a desktop processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1400 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1400
Celeron E1400
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 63 votes

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1400 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.