Celeron E1400: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46

Celeron E1400 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.46% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron E1400 sales on April 2008 at a recommended price of $57. This is an Allendale architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 65 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2000 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is LGA775 processor with a TDP of 65 Watt. It supports DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 memory.

Primary details

Celeron E1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2940
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.67of 100.00 (Ryzen Z1 Extreme)
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed2 GHzof 4.7 GHz (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed2 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
L1 cache64 KB (per core)of 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
L3 cache0 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography65 nmof 3 nm (EPYC 9845)
Die size77 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cof 110 °C (Core Ultra 9 185H)
Number of transistors105 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1400 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
SocketLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+
Turbo Boost Technology-
Hyper-Threading Technology-
Idle States+
Thermal Monitoring+
Demand Based Switching-
FSB parity-

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-
EDB+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-d-
VT-x-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Celeron E1400's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron E1400. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1400 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1400 735

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron E1400 220

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron E1400 392

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron E1400's performance relative to its closest rivals among desktop CPUs.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron E1400 is Athlon 64 X2 4200+, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron E1400:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron E1400, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron E1400 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 215 configurations using Celeron E1400 in our database.

RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
1.9% (4/215)
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
0.5% (1/215)
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
0.5% (1/215)
GTX 980 GeForce GTX 980
0.5% (1/215)
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
1.4% (3/215)
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
1.9% (4/215)
RX 570 Radeon RX 570
0.5% (1/215)
GTX 760 GeForce GTX 760
0.5% (1/215)

All comparisons with Celeron E1400

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


2.6 63 votes

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.