A10 Micro-6700T vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
A10 Micro-6700T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.90
+12.5%

A10 Micro-6700T outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25982534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.1618.93
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Mullins (2014)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket P PGA478FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
A10 Micro-6700T 0.90
+12.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
A10 Micro-6700T 1426
+11.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.90
Recency 26 September 2010 29 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

A10 Micro-6700T has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The A10 Micro-6700T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A10 Micro-6700T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
AMD A10 Micro-6700T
A10 Micro-6700T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 104 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate A10 Micro-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or A10 Micro-6700T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.