Ryzen 5 5500U vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated917
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiencyno data51.64
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB3 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketP (478)FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687
Ryzen 5 5500U 13015
+1794%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1797
Ryzen 5 5500U 5313
+196%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 3329
Ryzen 5 5500U 27437
+724%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1593
Ryzen 5 5500U 9185
+477%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 45.65
Ryzen 5 5500U 6.22
+634%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 5500U has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Ryzen 5 5500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Ryzen 5 5500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 18544 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or Ryzen 5 5500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.